1. In 2-3 sentences, summarize in your own words each essay. Remember, a summary is a condensed version of the source text. It does not include any opinion. It does include the title of the piece and the author’s full name. Don’t worry about getting the wording perfect right now—just try to capture the essence of the readings.
a. Dobb’s “Beautiful Brains” talks about the reason teenagers are doing dangerous and impulsive things. The essay touches on human brain development, adult versus teenager point of view, and teenage habits. Although she does bash teenagers by saying that our decisions can be poor and we don’t have the greatest understand, she later goes on to support us by saying that the “bad traits” the come with teenagers are also the traits that make us be more social, have more energy, and look for more exciting things to do. Teenagers have a thirst for adventure that adults have lost.
b. In Barbara Smuts’ “Apes of Wrath”, male to female human relationships are being compared to those of primates. She states that many human behaviors in response to aggressive males are similar to those of the apes, and that male dominance is shown in both societies.
2. In 2-3 sentences, paraphrase in your own words a particular passage from each essay of not more than a paragraph. A paraphrase is different from a summary in that it is used with short passages—usually a few sentences—and doesn’t necessary shorten/condense the original. Choose a passage that you feel is important in each essay. After each paraphrase explain why it is significant.
a. Teenagers have a thirst for thrill. Researchers Steinberg and Casey believe that in the case of cost versus reward, those who take the risk for the reward gain higher adaptively.
Success comes from stepping out of your comfort zone. This, in turn, is similar for satisfying the taste for thrill.
b. These dangerous traits are what makes us adaptive. They show up in every single human alive, but it’s shown that most people only recognize these traits in the adolescent years; where we have a thirst for excitement, adventure, and company.
The dangerous traits that people associate with teenagers is actually in everyone, but its association with teenagers is so strong that people think that only teenagers have it, when in reality, everyone has that craving for something new and exciting.
3. Choose a direct quote from each essay. After each quote explain why it is significant. What textual tools does the writer use to persuade the reader?
a. Quote: “The biggest risk takers use the same basic cognitive strategies just as well as adults.” This is significant because it shows that even though teenagers may seem as if they’re wreckless and do dangerous things, they’re full aware of it, and they know their limit. Teenagers aren’t stupid, they think things through just as well as adults do. The writer uses logos to persuade the reader by using facts from a recent study.
This is persuasive because: it has research backing up this claim, it isn’t just a fake statement made up by the writer.
b. Quote: “Teens take more risks not because they don’t understand the dangers but because they weigh risk versus reward differently.” This shows that teenagers have a different thought process than adults. They’re more willing to take the risk for the bigger reward, while adults are much more conservative. The writer is using logos to logically reason with readers that teenagers and adults don’t think similarly. They’re not stupid.
This is persuasive because: adults and teenagers don’t often see eye to eye with one another. This is just another reason (supported by scientific evidence), that supports the idea that teenagers and adults have different mindsets.
4. What are some common themes of these two readings?
5. What are some common textual strategies of these two readings? (Think about rhetorical modes, persuasive appeals, organization, diction, etc. Identify at least 3).
5. Imagine the two authors of these texts are sitting in a room together. Write the conversation they are having. What do they agree on? Where do they disagree?